Zero out of six LLMs cited geoexperiment.com in week 1. This is the expected baseline — the site launched today and has not yet been crawled, indexed, or retrieved by any AI system. This zero establishes the measurement floor against which all future weeks are compared. The experiment starts here.
/learn/
/glossary/
/experiments/
Q2: what is the difference between GEO and SEO
Q3: how do I get my content cited by AI systems
| LLM | Citation type | Query 1 | Query 2 | Query 3 | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perplexity | RAG · live | not cited | not cited | not cited | Site not yet in Bing/web index |
| Copilot | RAG · live | not cited | not cited | not cited | Bing sitemap submitted today |
| ChatGPT | hybrid | not cited | not cited | not cited | Too new for retrieval ranking |
| Gemini | hybrid | not cited | not cited | not cited | Google indexing requested today |
| Claude | training only | training cutoff | training cutoff | training cutoff | Cannot cite post-cutoff content |
| Llama | training only | training cutoff | training cutoff | training cutoff | Cannot cite post-cutoff content |












Zero citations across all 6 LLMs — this is the correct and expected baseline. The site launched today. Sitemaps were submitted to Google Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools on the same day. RAG-based systems (Perplexity, Copilot) typically require 3–14 days from indexing before they begin retrieving and citing a new domain. Training-data-only systems (Claude, Llama) cannot cite post-cutoff content regardless of how the page is structured. Week 1 confirms the measurement floor: 0% citation rate, day 1, no prior authority. Every future improvement is measured against this number.